Back to school leaders use cases

Whole school

How to run MTSS

MTSS is a tiered framework: core instruction for every student, targeted Tier 2 support in small groups, and intensive Tier 3 support, with data deciding who gets what. This guide gives MTSS coordinators three steps, and shows how Flint tells a coach which students have not met a standard and why, free to try at your school.

Title card reading 'How to run MTSS', next to three chat cards: the MTSS coordinator asks which students have not met MS-LS1-6 and what misconception each showed, Sparky says Henry attributed plant food and tree mass to soil minerals and water, and Sparky groups Henry, James and Elijah because they share the same core gap.

"Students have learned they can use the tool on their own to get feedback and instruction whenever they need it. They have leveraged Flint to democratize individualized tutoring, ensuring that academic support is accessible to all."

Mica MulloyMica Mulloy, Assistant Principal for Instruction & Innovation at Brophy College Preparatory

Why this matters

An MTSS coordinator plans small groups from screening scores, and schools generally screen three times a year (MTSS Center). A score says a student is behind, and says nothing about what the student misunderstood. Teachers see the misunderstanding in class work every day, but nobody has time to read all of it, so a student who thinks plants get their food from the soil can carry that idea until the next screening.

What MTSS is, and the three tiers

A multi-tiered system of supports (MTSS) is "a proactive and preventative framework that integrates data and instruction to maximize student success", according to the Center on Multi-Tiered System of Supports at the American Institutes for Research. The Center names four essential components: screening, progress monitoring, a multi-level prevention system and data-based decision making (MTSS Center).

The prevention system has three tiers of increasing intensity. Tier 1 is high-quality core instruction for all students, and in an effective system most students do well with Tier 1 alone. Tier 2 is small-group support with interventions that have worked for the same need, and it gives students more practice and corrective feedback. Tier 3 is intensive, individualized support for students who don't respond to Tier 2 (MTSS Center). Teams decide who moves between tiers with written decision rules and a problem-solving process (MTSS Center).

  1. Check that Tier 1 works for most students in each class
  2. Group students for Tier 2 by the specific skill they missed
  3. Look across subjects before a student moves to more intensive support

Screeners and progress-monitoring tools give the scores for these steps, and Flint is neither. Flint shows where students stand on the standards your school adopted, from their work in Flint, and Sparky, Flint's AI, can tell a coach what each student got wrong.

Sparky shows the coach which students have not met a standard, and why

The school, students and staff here are made up. Sparky's answers are its real answers about an example class, shortened.

Sparky names what each student got wrong, from their own workSparky groups students by the gap they shareSparky says who to check on before groupingSparky looks at one student across subjects
M

Mr. Bennett

Role: MTSS coordinatorLooking at: 7th grade science, standard MS-LS1-6

Mr. Bennett

Which students in this class have not met MS-LS1-6 yet, and what misconception did each of them show?

Sparky

Henry: Attributed plant food and tree mass to soil minerals and water…
James: Said photosynthesis inputs are "dirt, water and sun," that it happens in the roots…
Elijah: Listed oxygen as an input rather than a product, guessed the nucleus as the site of photosynthesis…
Charlotte: Initially included soil nutrients as a reactant instead of CO₂… she corrected this after a hint…

Mr. Bennett

Can you group these students for small-group support next week, and say what each group should work on?

Sparky

Group 1: "Where does plant mass come from?" Henry, James, Elijah
These three share the same core gap: they believe soil, water, or roots are the primary source of plant matter… Tracing carbon atoms from air → glucose → plant tissue…

A note on Charlotte: Her misconception appeared to self-correct with a hint during her session, so she may not need small-group re-teaching. Worth checking in with her individually first before placing her in a group.

Mr. Bennett

Which students are struggling in both 7th Grade Science and 8th Grade English? What did they miss in each class?

Sparky

James is the confirmed student struggling in both 7th Grade Science and 8th Grade English.

7th Grade Science
Tree Mass (Developing…): Partly attributed tree mass to soil/water, didn't use the 2-ounce soil loss vs. 164-pound tree gain as evidence…
8th Grade English
Theme and Evidence (Needs Improvement…): Summarized the plot instead of stating a theme…

Priority areas for James: Using precise evidence to support claims (Science), and distinguishing plot summary from theme (English).

Got a small group for next week, one student to check on first, and one student to discuss across subjects

What Flint did for Mr. Bennett

  • Sparky named each student's misconception from their own answers, such as James writing "dirt, water and sun" for what a plant takes in.
  • Sparky put Henry, James and Elijah in one group because all three think plant mass comes from the soil, and said to check in with Charlotte first because she fixed her mistake after a hint.
  • Sparky found that James is struggling in both science and English, with a different gap in each: precise evidence in science, and summarizing the plot instead of stating a theme in English.

A coordinator can't read every student's work in every class before a data meeting, and Sparky reads all of it.

The Outcomes page shows where every student stands on each standard

Where students stand, on Flint's Outcomes page, splits every standard into Met, Approaching and Not yet, for the whole school or one class. Standards Outcomes below it shows each student's evidence from their work, grouped by how the student engaged the standard, such as Needed support or Misconception corrected.

Flint's school Outcomes page for a made-up school, Oak Hill Academy. Where students stand in 7th Grade Science shows 85 assessed student-standard pairs Met (60%), 51 Approaching (36%) and 5 Not yet (4%), with a bar for each of six life science standards; MS-LS1-6 is 79% met. Standards Outcomes is open on Needed support, with cards for Henry, James and Elijah: Henry first said the mass came from minerals and water in the soil, James wrote dirt, water and sun, and Elijah listed water and oxygen as inputs.

Example school

Where 7th grade science students stand on life science standards

The school, staff and students are made up for this page.

Try it with your school for free

Flint is free for up to 80 users, counting students, teachers and administrators. A teacher adopts standards in a class's Curriculum tab and turns on Auto-grading with a rubric in an activity's settings, so Sparky grades the work against those standards. Then open Admin, then Analytics, then Outcomes for the whole school, or open a class and click Analytics in the class sidebar for one class. The speech-bubble button at the top left opens Ask Sparky about your analytics.

For more on what school leaders see in Flint, read Flint for school leaders.

Other use cases

See all use cases →

Learning feels different when it fits you.